: Latest News

Ulster Human Rights Watch (UHRW) is calling for a radical new approach to dealing with the legacy of the past, with victims of terrorism placed front and centre in a new strategy. This message was delivered by UHRW in a meeting with Ian Paisley MP.

The Lurgan-based organisation is also proposing the setting up of a Committee for Peace, Freedom and Reconciliation. This should be created to combat terrorism and radicalisation and promote peace, freedom and reconciliation.

UHRW has produced a detailed Paper exposing the serious deficiencies of the Stormont House Agreement (SHA) which, if uncorrected, would lead to ‘highly undesirable and disappointing results’ for innocent victims.

The Paper argues that the SHA fails to include a definition of a victim and highlights weaknesses in the four new bodies that are proposed.

The human rights charity makes the case for an alternative to addressing the legacy of the past both in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

Ulster Human Rights Watch Advocacy Manager, Axel Schmidt, said: “We support the new approach outlined by the Secretary of State in March last year and want to make the point that only a radical shake-up of proposed arrangements is appropriate.

“We want arrangements that effectively and efficiently address the legacy of the past. The SHA falls far short of doing that.

“Now, is the time to go back to the drawing board to replace the serious deficiencies in the SHA. Its major failing was that it did not provide a definition of a ‘victim’.

“Victims of crime, who in relation to the Troubles are victims of terrorism, must be dissociated from perpetrators of acts of terrorism. Therefore, the definition of victim of terrorism should constitute the basis of any new arrangements for dealing with the legacy of the past.

“An analysis of the functioning of the SHA suggested bodies reveals key issues of concern and weaknesses. It would appear that these bodies, instead of serving the interests of victims of terrorism and society at large, would be used against former members of the police and the armed forces and benefit those who were engaged in terrorism and their sympathisers.

“An alternative is required to address the legacy of the past, which will bring about a satisfactory resolution within the context of a democratic society. It should be based on fundamental principles that uphold human rights for all interested parties: victims of terrorism, police officers and army personnel. Investigating bodies such as the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland and the Legacy Investigation Branch should be made compliant with human rights requirements.

“An archive for victims of terrorism stories and testimonies should be created in the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, to be made available to the public. A Committee for Peace, Freedom and Reconciliation should be created to develop policies and educational programmes to combat terrorism and radicalisation and promote peace, freedom and reconciliation.

“The alternative should also involve the Republic of Ireland in setting up investigating and information recovery bodies that would mirror those existing in Northern Ireland. These bodies would investigate historical cases and criminal activities that may have been committed by members of the Garda Síochána.

“They would also review numerous extradition requests made by the United Kingdom but never honoured by the Republic of Ireland and co-operate with the authorities in Northern Ireland for the resolution of historical cases. The Republic of Ireland would also make its archives available for consultation in relation to historical cases, as they are in Northern Ireland.

“This comprehensive approach to dealing with the legacy of the past has the potential to deliver a final settlement and durable peace.”

A clumsy attempt at a cover-up is how Ulster Human Rights Watch is describing Irish Government documents relating to the massacre of soldiers at Narrow Water forty-two years ago.

Official papers released to National Archives Ireland challenge and deny that the detonation point for the bomb(s) was across the border in County Louth. The documents from the Department of the Taoiseach are contradicted by follow-up actions by the Gardai who discovered the detonation point in the Cooley Peninsula.

UHRW says four official documents strongly suggest a co-ordinated Irish Government attempt at disinformation.

UHRW Advocacy Support Officer, Jonathan Larner, said: “The official line from Dublin, that persisted with the lie that the Republic of Ireland had not been used in this horrific ambush, is staggering. It’s time Dublin came clean and told the relatives of the murdered and injured soldiers the full extent of what happened.

“We would ask Taoiseach Micheál Martin, to explain this official position of the Government. To all intents and purposes, this was a clumsy attempt at a cover-up to conceal the fact that Republic of Ireland territory was used to carry out the atrocity.

“The suggestion that Gardaí failed to properly investigate the Narrow Water detonation site, and secure its integrity for RUC investigators, is central to the allegations of collusion with the Provisional IRA.

“Now, it turns out that, while Gardaí had supposedly investigated the site and gathered evidence against suspects, the Irish Government was forwarding a co-ordinated line of disinformation, to assert that the detonation site was not in their jurisdiction.

“If Taoiseach Micheál Martin is serious about a ‘Shared Island’, and engagement with unionists, then perhaps he can start by addressing precisely what the Minister for Justice and Department of the Taoiseach were doing.’

UHRW has written to the Taoiseach in the search for answers.

It asks why the then Taoiseach, Jack Lynch, was advised to challenge the plausibility of the detonation site and why his Justice Minister, Gerry Collins, publicly denied any State responsibility when Gardai were already investigating the crime.

Mr Larner continued: “Were officials deliberately setting out to cover the State’s embarrassment for allowing its territory to be used by republican terrorists and did the Gardaí inform the Government of the facts?”

UHRW represents the brother of one of the murdered soldiers who wishes to remain anonymous.

He said: “These documents betray a blatant dishonesty on the part of the Irish Government. Officials advised their Ministers, but why did these same senior politicians not believe An Garda Síochána?

“The firing point was never in doubt, yet it didn’t prevent officials from mounting a crude effort to falsify and mislead. Were officials told to do this and, if so, who gave that instruction? I would like the Taoiseach to shed light on this and work to expose a troubling part of the Republic of Ireland’s role in a vile terrorist campaign.”

Documents:

1. Document summing up the challenges facing the Irish government in the wake of the killing of Lord Mountbatten and eighteen British soldiers:

It has not been lost on the British and other media that both outrages took place in close proximity to the border, one on our soil, the other with allegations of involvement (however dubious) from the southern side of the border.

(NAI 2009/135/754: 29 August – 03 September 1979; p.2, para.1)

https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/nai/1979/nai_TSCH-2009-135-754_1979-08-29a.pdf

2. Statement by the Minister for Justice, Gerry Collins TD, in response to comments by John Taylor MEP:

He tries to convey the impression that the tragic deaths of 20 British soldiers were the result of activity directed from here. Mr. Taylor has no evidence to support this. The explosions occurred in Northern Ireland and any attempt to imply that the crime was committed by people from the South is reckless speculation.

(NAI 2009/135/704: 31 August 1979; p.2, para.1)

https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/nai/1979/nai_TSCH-2009-135-704_1979-08-31a.pdf

3. Meeting with British Prime Minister, London, 5^th September 1979, Summary Notes:

There is no evidence, so far, any shooting at Warrenpoint, came from the Irish side of the border. There is no evidence to the effect that the detonation was effected from this side of the border.

(NAI 2009/135/704: 03 September 1979; p.7, para.5)

https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/nai/1979/nai_TSCH-2009-135-704_1979-09-03.pdf

4. ‘Panorama Programme’, Briefing document prepared for J. Lynch, then Taoiseach, in the wake of the killing of Lord Mountbatten and 18 British soldiers near Warrenpoint, County Down:

He might reiterate readiness to take every action open to us, refer to charging of two men for Lord Mountbatten’s murder and to lack of evidence, as yet, of southern involvement in Warrenpoint attack, despite so many unqualified statements that it was mounted from South of the Border.

(NAI 2009/135/701: 10-11 September 1979; p.3, para.2)

https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/nai/1979/nai_TSCH-2009-135-701_1979-nd_a.pdf

An incomplete legacy report into the PIRA massacre at Narrow Water in 1979 has been described as a ‘disrespectful and unacceptable piece of work’ by the family of one of the eighteen murdered soldiers.

The investigation was begun by the Historical Enquiries Team (HET) nine years ago, but was never completed.

HET’s successor, the PSNI Legacy Investigation Branch (LIB), has handed over the draft report which does not appear to shed any new light on the terrorist ambush.

Human rights body, Ulster Human Rights Watch (UHRW) represents the family of one soldier murdered in the PIRA’s deadliest attack on the Army.

UHRW’s Advocacy Support Worker, Jonathan Larner, said: “The family feels let down and badly treated by the HET. Now LIB have handed over a forty-four-page unfinished report that essentially ‘whitewashes’ the investigative failings of An Garda Siochana, dismissing allegations of collusion.

“It was only released because of the pressure that has been applied by Ulster Human Rights Watch and the Veterans’ Commissioner, Danny Kinahan. It is incomplete and leaves many questions unanswered.

The family of the murdered soldier doesn’t want to be identified, but in a statement provided to UHRW, a brother described the partial report as falling far short of their expectations.

The brother said: “We’d hoped to get some closure, some answers to questions we’ve had for more than forty years. This isn’t the way victims should be treated. We lost a loved one and all we can get after nearly eight years is an unfinished report. Without the support of Ulster Human Rights Watch I’m sure we would still be ignored. It’s an insult and a travesty.

“The Draft report says that that the HET review was complete. What we want is for this report to be completed, and for the outstanding questions around the Gardai investigation to be fairly addressed.

“This is no way to conduct legacy investigations and certainly no way to treat relatives.

“They must re-think their whole approach and made it more victim-centred and meaningful.”

Veterans’ Commissioner, Danny Kinahan, said: “This incomplete draft report is a disappointment to relatives and I will use my position to press for answers and for this process to be brought to a satisfactory conclusion by LIB. It is the very least that the families of those soldiers murdered at Narrow Water deserve. I will also continue to engage with LIB on behalf of other families who are still awaiting a completed report.”